Testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Countering the People’s Republic of China’s Economic and Technological Plan for Dominance Dewey Murdick, Ph.D. Director, Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET), Georgetown University May 11, 2022 Chairman Warner, Vice Chairman Rubio, members of the committee, thank you for the invitation. China is keenly aware of its gaps and is using every means available to close them In 2018, a Chinese state-run newspaper identified nearly three dozen crucial technologies that relied on specific imports that make China vulnerable to other countries’ potential sanctions and export controls. In a series of articles, the full list of which is provided below in Appendix A, the authors covered topics including: ● The difficulty with producing rocket engines and aviation landing gear due to limitations in making high-strength steel; ● The challenges of building reliable high-resolution LiDAR (or light detecting and ranging sensors) that are the “eyes” of many unmanned vehicles; and ● Detailed gaps in China’s ability to produce key semiconductor manufacturing equipment components. These articles expressed the feeling that the United States and other powers could use these and other limitations to “strangle” China at any time. The Chinese are keenly aware of their strengths and deficits, and are making strides toward achieving technological self-sufficiency. They regularly leverage a wide range of government powers in an attempt to dominate key technology areas — not just the cutting edge. Understanding who is leading and following in emerging technologies between the United States and China requires evaluating comparative success across several key markers of leadership. These include research-driven knowledge creation, financial investment, human talent, intellectual property ownership, market share in technologies, and international standards and norm setting. Using these measures, it is helpful to understand what China sees as its comparative advantages or weaknesses in emerging technology development. For example, an article published in January by the Institute for International and Strategic Studies at Peking University notes China’s own technological strength has been improving progressively in recent years and it has become an influential science and technology (S&T) power. In artificial intelligence and machine learning, the Chinese consider themselves to be leading in product-driven research and development areas like facial and speech recognition, computer vision, and talent training at scale. In basic research, the United States and China are comparable in terms of scientific research paper publication and citation numbers. Yet the Chinese also know they lag behind the United States in original, groundbreaking research and in universities’ and employers’ ability to attract and retain top AI talent. Further, they view U.S. efforts to coordinate AI technology standards among global democracies as compounding their own problems with internally coordinating standards at different levels of government. The United States still has a large lead over rapidly-advancing China in AI chips, algorithms, machine learning, and other core technologies; it leads in promoting military AI applications, and it has introduced ML technology in biosynthesis and drug R&D, achieving major breakthroughs. Though the United States relies heavily on foreign chip manufacturing, it maintains an overall technological advantage through its possession of intellectual property and the integration of IP in advanced semiconductor supply chains. Though China’s circuit industry is rapidly developing, it faces redundancies and foreign dependencies that keep it well behind the United States. And the same Peking University study cited above also 1 notes that the technical strength gap between China and the United States in 5G and other communications technologies is narrow. Beyond AI, the Chinese are also aware of the places where they maintain leverage over the United States in key parts of global supply chains. A December 2020 Congressional Research Service (CRS) report stated that, in 2019, 57.7 percent of U.S. imports of malaria diagnostic test kits came from China, as did more than 90 percent of key antibiotics and their derivative imports. As reported in a recent Nature article, the pandemic demonstrated the massive disruptive effects of China’s dominance in bioeconomic supply chains for U.S. research and medical care, including backlogs of medical PPE and laboratory equipment vital to operations like gloves, pipette tips, and bleach for decontamination. Experimental materials including DNA extraction kits and research animals were also interrupted. Labs could not conduct any kind of research during this time, halting or slowing groundbreaking and innovative research. China gaining advantages in any of these technologies, be it artificial intelligence, semiconductors, genome editing, or quantum technologies, would have implications for global security — and potentially, U.S. intelligence community operations. The United States has three basic ways to shape its response The United States needs to prepare now for the long term. As China’s tech ecosystem matures and becomes increasingly innovative, the United States risks being surprised (and falling behind) because we don’t have a comprehensive view of what China and other actors are doing across the technology landscape. I see three basic classes of responses for the United States and its allies that need to be used together to achieve the greatest effect: run faster, slow competitors down, and monitor the entire science and technology landscape more effectively. First, the U.S. government could help the nation run faster. It could spur on the innovation ecosystem by expanding efforts to buy down risk, investing in innovation incubation, and reducing friction points that might slow U.S.-centric private sector innovation. An increase in funding focused on the transition of research and engineering innovations into American-made products would also yield positive domestic outcomes. Second, the U.S. government can work with its allies to slow down the pursuing competition and protect critical technology. The United States should work with like-minded countries to maximize the effectiveness of export controls, sanctions and other related measures, as appropriate. However, these measures will not be effective on their own over time because they can be circumvented, require complicated multi-party coordination, create perverse incentives for tech firms to leave the United States, and spur China to innovate around them. Such methods are most useful when employed selectively in combination with run faster and the third option, S&T landscape monitoring. Third, the United States must improve its monitoring of the science and technology landscape. Doing so is critical to our success in long-term competition with a high-tech peer. Specifically, Congress can support an analytic capability that monitors the S&T landscape and enables rapid adoption of new capabilities that offset Chinese advantages. It also is critical in fast follower situations. China’s rapid rise in science and technology has been facilitated by more than 60,000 open-source collectors and analysts. China’s large-scale S&T analysis capability has enjoyed massive, multilayered and sustained state support. The resources devoted to these efforts allow China to prioritize technical areas for exploration and help ensure that the country is not surprised by worldwide innovations. To my knowledge, no part of the U.S. government — including the intelligence community — has developed a scalable countermeasure to the Chinese approach. Instead, the United States relies on private sector parties to watch the threat and opportunity horizon, and has a limited S&T intelligence analysis capability that typically focuses on foreign threats in a handful of areas without comprehensive context. The United States has made no systematic, continuous, and scalable investment into the wholesale survey and monitoring of the worldwide S&T landscape. This analytic gap directly affects national security and economic competitiveness. And it undermines the country’s ability to make informed technologyrelated decisions. 2 Analysis capabilities are essential to enable competition with a high-tech peer CSET and others have proposed options to create this much-needed independent capability that uses unclassified sources to monitor global developments in emerging technologies. In fact, CSET has built a relevant prototype. To be effective, it must sit apart from the intelligence community due to authority and incentive challenges. The U.S. government needs a continuous analysis of the global S&T landscape to support strategic planning and decisions by federal, state, and local authorities in areas such as the following: ● Prioritization of R&D investment and divestment; ● Expert finding, selecting collaborations, and partnerships; and ● Timely insight on the constantly changing targets of unwanted tech transfer. A well-resourced S&T analysis and monitoring organization with sustained funding: ● Creates an unclassified foundation on top of which more sensitive threat work can be overlaid; ● Functions seamlessly across foreign and domestic technological challenges; ● Assembles a critical mass of resources that are hard to find due to high setup costs, such as technical infrastructure, data resources, expert technical input, and analytic talent; and ● Works to enable innovations to move from research to practice. We need to embrace this transformative S&T landscape monitoring mission. When used in combination with “run faster” and “slow them down” policy options, it will help maintain U.S. leadership in critical emerging technologies and supply chains — now and into the future. Thank you, and I look forward to our discussion. 3 Appendix A: Citation Information for the 35 “Chokepoints” Articles Article Citation (1) Photolithography machines !"#$%& [staff reporter Gao Bo], “'(’)*’+,-./0123456” [“These ‘Details’ Keep (2) Microchips !"#$:;<=>?? [staff reporters Zhang Gailun and Fu Lili], “,@A’B’CD,-AEC” Top Photolithography Machines a Distant Prospect for China”], 789" [S&T Daily], April 19, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/5DGC-8786 and https://perma.cc/BZK5-F8QE.1 [“ZTE’s Chip Problem Gives China Heart Palpitations”], 789" [S&T Daily], April 20, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/H8XT-6Z6Q and https://perma.cc/E89F-Y9JT. (3) Operating systems !"#$%& [staff reporter Gao Bo], “FGH4DIJKLMNOPAQ-RS” [“Lost Opportunities: (4) Aircraft engine nacelles !"#$TU [staff reporter Jiao Yang], “V$WXYD-Z[\]^4A_`Ra” [“No Homes of The Pains of a Great Power Without a Domestically Developed Operating System”], 789" [S&T Daily], April 23, 2018, 1, https://perma.cc/DL52-V2VL. Their Own: The Nacelle Problem of Domestic Aircraft Engines”], 789" [S&T Daily], April 24, 2018, 1, https://perma.cc/3GP8-UMDQ. (5) Touch sensors !"#$:bc [staff reporter Zhang Jiaxing], “defghDijkA4fl’-Zmn’“ [“An (for industrial robots) Oversight in Sensors, a ‘Domestic Touch’ for Dumbed-Down Robots”], 789" [S&T Daily], April 25, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/A3JG-V8F2 and https://perma.cc/6SQ5-25TP. (6) Vacuum evaporators !"#$op [staff reporter Liu Yan], “q\rs4tuv%wxyz{A|}” [“Vacuum Evaporator (7) High-end radio frequency (RF) components !"#$%& [staff reporter Gao Bo], “~•f€v•‚ƒlA„4…†” [“RF Components: For Mobile (8) Primers and reagents used for iCLIP technology (for RNA manipulation) !"#$:bc [staff reporter Zhang Jiaxing], “‘‡ˆ’.‰D-ZŠ‹Œ•Ž•” [“‘Targets’ Are Elusive, (9) Heavy-duty gas turbines !"#$•‘ [staff reporter Qu Jian], “‘’“”•’D–—˜™š4A›œR•” [“‘Weakness between the Shortage: A Shadow over High-End Displays”], 789" [S&T Daily], April 26, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/4KMP-NE8P and https://perma.cc/ZU9A-9LAC. Phones, an Embarrassing Reliance on Others”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 7, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/6CJH-HRYM and https://perma.cc/5UQ2-J6CB. Leaving Domestic Production of Innovative Drugs in a Fog”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 8, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/6JF4-4VJ5 and https://perma.cc/C9UE-M4TG. Kidneys’—The Blade Wounds of Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 9, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/H9SV-LDWU and https://perma.cc/WW9D-RSM8. 1 Most of the “chokepoints” articles published by Chinese state-run newspaper Science and Technology Daily (S&T Daily; !"#$) in 2018— profiled in the upcoming CSET report “Chokepoints: China’s Self-Identified Strategic Technology Import Dependencies”—begin on page one and continue onto a subsequent page. In these cases, we provide two URLs. The first one links to a PDF of page one of the relevant issue of S&T Daily, a page that includes the first half of the “chokepoints” article among other articles. The second PDF is of the page of the newspaper that contains the second half of the “chokepoints” article in question. 4 (10) LiDAR žŸ#$ ¡ [reporter intern Cui Shuang], “¢2£¤¥¦D+K^§¨•©ª” [“LiDAR Dimness Leaves Autonomous Driving in a Tangle”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 10, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/SCA7-XVBN and https://perma.cc/KRK3-P5LA. (11) Airworthiness standards !"#$TU [staff reporter Jiao Yang], “«[¬-v-Z[]®¯°.±A²³” [“Airworthiness (12) High-end capacitors and resistors !"#$%& [staff reporter Gao Bo], “IJ'(´µD¶·¸¹º%w»¼»½” [“Without This (13) Electronic design automation (EDA) software !"#$¾¿À [staff reporter Yu Huiyou], “ÁEÂÃÄ€vÅÆÇÈA,-’WlÉ’“ [“Core Industrial (14) High-end indium tin oxide (ITO) sputtering target materials !"#$ÊËÌ [staff reporter Zhao Hanbin], “͹ÎQχÐDÑÒxyÇÈ•lÓÔ” [“Unable to (15) Core algorithms (for robotics) !"#$ÕÖ [staff reporter Yang Lun], “ר¹ÙD-ZÂÃ4flJˆ’Ú’“ [“With Inept Algorithms, Standards: Another Difficult Hurdle for Domestic Aircraft Engines”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 11, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/669C-55H8 and https://perma.cc/FZ7U-AR3W. Know-How, High-End Capacitors and Resistors Will Remain Beyond Our Reach”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 14, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/57QK-KFUJ and https://perma.cc/FBN7-2ADB. Software: China’s ‘Uncharted Territory’ in Smart Manufacturing”], 789" [S&T Daily], 1–2, May 17, 2018, https://perma.cc/7GW3-J2T5 and https://perma.cc/4U7J-RHV9. Sinter Large-Size Targets, Panel Display Manufacturing Depends on Others for Survival”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 18, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/DXH8-XXGN and https://perma.cc/J9LC-RTL4. Domestically Produced Robots Are a Bit ‘Slow’“], 789" [S&T Daily], May 22, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/QP2T-RBCN and https://perma.cc/EY6D-UWJP. (16) Aviation-grade !"#$ÛÜÝ [staff reporter Sun Yusong], “[\ÞйßàD-ZQá4âãGä” [“Weak in steel (for landing Aviation-Grade Steel, Large Domestic Aircraft Lack Support for Takeoff and Landing”], 789" [S&T gear) Daily], May 23, 2018, 1–2, https://perma.cc/PT8S-6AKK and https://perma.cc/73ST-RYWR. (17) Milling cutters !"#$åæ [staff reporter Hua Ling], “ç%èÞé’ê¼’D-Zëì.í–î” [“For High-Speed Railway Track ‘Facelifts,’ Domestic Milling Cutters Are Not Up to the Task”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 24, 2018, 1, https://perma.cc/W4VP-4YAR. (18) High-end bearing steel !"#$ïðÌ [staff reporter Wang Yanbin], “%wñòÞD.óôõA,-ÇÈÃ_Ò” [“High-End Bearing Steel, a Difficult Shortcoming for Chinese Manufacturing to Overcome”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 25, 2018, 1, https://perma.cc/26AR-FFKY. (19) High-pressure !"#$ïö÷=øùúïÜû [staff reporter Wang Haibin and correspondent Wang Yufang], “%üý piston pumps (for hydraulic machinery) þÿD!",-#$ÇÈÃ%&A¯'(” [“High-Pressure Piston Pumps: A Thorn in the Side of China’s Equipment Manufacturing Industry”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 28, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/XA2SQBGQ and https://perma.cc/WV9R-NN3Q. (20) Aviation design !"#$:) [staff reporter Zhang Ye], “[\Ä€a*D-Zá4+,-{’./0’“ [“Aviation software Software Plight Has Domestic Aircraft Design under a ‘Skull-Squeezing Curse’“], 789" [S&T Daily], May 30, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/RU6C-MTQS and https://perma.cc/U9HU-YC5V. (21) High-end photoresists (for photolithography) !"#$ß-1 [staff reporter Guo Guozhong], “,-234ZÃ5236G7” [“China’s Semiconductor Industry Losing Its Luster Due to Photoresists”], 789" [S&T Daily], May 31, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/MYL5-PYGZ and https://perma.cc/KD25-QMZW. 5 (22) High-pressure common rail direct fuel injection systems (for lowemission diesel engines) !"#$89:=o; [staff reporters Jiang Dongzhou and Liu Hao], “%ü<é¹,=D-Z>?4• @A” [“When High-Pressure Common Rail Is No Good, Domestic Diesel Engine Production Suffers”], 78 9" [S&T Daily], June 4, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/T7JN-4GU7 and https://perma.cc/R83U-KFA4. (23) Transmission !"#$:bc [staff reporter Zhang Jiaxing], “¶·ABCD3D%EFœ•GHIAJ~K»L” electron [“High-Definition 3D Photographs of Our Proteins are Dependent on Foreign Transmission Electron microscopes (TEM) Microscopes”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 6, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/HX2Z-BF6V and https://perma.cc/6YPW-346K. (24) Main bearings for tunnel boring machines (TBM) !"#$TU [staff reporter Jiao Yang], “KMANO4P¹Q¹=RlASñò” [“Chinese-Made (25) Microspheres !"#$%& [staff reporter Gao Bo], “TUvVWÂùÆò@RX” [“Microspheres: The Unbearable Tunnel Boring Machines Have to Use Main Bearings from Others”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 7, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/SD3Z-E622 and https://perma.cc/QJA5-WMUM. Lightness of National Industry”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 12, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/TF8V-L8ZX and https://perma.cc/P27W-8LSP. (26) Underwater connectors !"#$YZ [staff reporter Chen Yu], “[\]^u-Z_fDö`abcdlef” [“With No Domestic Producers of Underwater Connectors, Seafloor Observation Network Depends on Others”], 789 " [S&T Daily], June 13, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/K8ZS-6JWZ and https://perma.cc/G93B-6SH6. (27) Key materials for fuel cells !"#$:;< [staff reporter Zhang Gailun], “ghijklÐmD˜m»noÃp.qrs” (28) High-end welding power sources (for underwater welding robots) !"#$›t=uvw [staff reporters Ye Qing and Long Yuemei], “-Zx^»y’z”’D4fl[\ (29) Lithium battery separators !"#$ÛÜÝ [staff reporter Sun Yusong], “¯|}~•–€v-Z•»n‚ƒ„…†9” [“One Layer of Separators, Two Very Different Environments: Domestic Lithium Battery Production Still Waiting for the Clouds to Part”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 21, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/DN9Q-C6T6 and https://perma.cc/42QZ-EYNV. [“Without Three Key Materials, Fuel Cell Commercialization Will Be Hard to Achieve”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 14, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/EQ5E-GYGV and https://perma.cc/6NAR-HB27. NÃJEW{” [“Domestic Production of Welding Power Sources ‘Misfires,’ Frustrating Underwater Robot Operations”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 20, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/UZG7-NBU7 and https://perma.cc/47XR-D898. (30) Components !"#$:bc [staff reporter Zhang Jiaxing], “‡kAˆbf‰Šh‹Œ}•” [“Dull Detectors Blur for medical imaging Medical Imaging”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 25, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/H62R-UUH7 and equipment https://perma.cc/6SZ3-XU3T. (31) Ultra-precision !"#$:ŽU [staff reporter Zhang Jingyang], “ø••Ù‘’2“R”D•½–—” [“In Ultrapolishing Precision Polishing Techniques, the Road to the Top is Long and Rocky”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 26, techniques 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/N6V6-FETT and https://perma.cc/LLZ2-2G7H. (32) Epoxy (for high-end carbon fiber) !"#$˜™ [staff reporter Li He], “š›œ•žŸ¹ D-Z¡¢£u¤¥³” [“Insufficient Resiliency in Epoxy Means Domestic Carbon Fiber Lacks Strength”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 27, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/2TVR-8PZK and https://perma.cc/SU6R-E4Y5. 6 (33) High-strength stainless steel (for rocket engines) !"#$>¦á=žŸ#$ƒ§¨ [staff reporter Fu Yifei and reporter intern Yu Ziyue], “©¹ªA”« (34) Database management systems !"#$%& [staff reporter Gao Bo], “®ä¯°±OPv,-²"‰³’´µ¶·¸K’“ [“Database (35) Scanning electron microscopes (SEM) žŸ#$¹qº [reporter intern Lu Chengkuan], “»¼»L’½¾’DÂÃÇÈ.ó¿hÀÁ” [“Scanning Electron Microscope ‘Visual Impairment’ Makes Minute Observation Difficult for Industrial Manufacturing”], 789" [S&T Daily], July 3, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/VWV2-AFDP and https://perma.cc/9LVG-V9ES. ]^4’¬-’“ [“The Intractable ‘Rust Disease’ of Rocket Engines”], 789" [S&T Daily], June 28, 2018, 1, 3, https://perma.cc/KH74-9FKL and https://perma.cc/TTV7-CY7R. Management Systems: China still Looking for the ‘Right Way to Open’“], 789" [S&T Daily], July 2, 2018, 1, 4, https://perma.cc/MDR9-JJCG and https://perma.cc/3ZEP-2DZX. 7 Appendix B: Recommended Reading Zachary Arnold and Melissa Flagg, "A New Institutional Approach to Research Security in the United States” (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, January 2021). https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/a-new-institutional-approachto-research-security-in-the-united-states/ Tarun Chhabra, William Hannas, Dewey Murdick, and Anna Puglisi, “Open-Source Intelligence for S&T Analysis” (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, September 2020). https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/open-sourceintelligence-for-st-analysis/ CSIS Technology and Intelligence Task Force, “Maintaining the Intelligence Edge: Reimagining and Reinventing Intelligence through Innovation” (Center for Strategic and International Studies, January 2021). https://www.csis.org/analysis/maintaining-intelligence-edge-reimagining-and-reinventing-intelligence-through-innovation Ryan Fedasiuk, Emily Weinstein, and Anna Puglisi, "China’s Foreign Technology Wish List" (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, May 2021). https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/chinas-foreign-technology-wish-list/ Melissa Flagg and Paul Harris, "System Re-engineering: A New Policy Framework for the American R&D System in a Changed World" (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, September 2020). https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/system-re-engineering/ William Hannas and Huey-Meei Chang, "China's STI Operations" (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, January 2021). https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/chinas-sti-operations/ Will Hunt, "Sustaining U.S. Competitiveness in Semiconductor Manufacturing" (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, January 2022). https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/sustaining-u-s-competitiveness-in-semiconductormanufacturing/ Ben Murphy, “Chokepoints: China’s Self-Identified Strategic Technology Import Dependencies” (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, May 2022). Forthcoming Alex Rubin, Alan Omar Loera Martinez, Jake Dow, and Anna Puglisi "The Huawei Moment" (Center for Security and Emerging Technology, July 2021). https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/the-huawei-moment/ Wang Jisi, Zhao Jianwei, Hu Ran, Zhang Chengyang, and Zhang Yike, “Sino-U.S. Strategic Competition in the Technology Domain: Analysis and Outlook” (Institute for International and Strategic Studies at Peking University, January 2022). http://cn3.uscnpm.org/model_item.html?action=view&table=article&id=27016 8